Why isn’t FAIR enough? Bringing together methods and values for Open Science uptake
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2532-8816/20976Keywords:
FAIR principles, Care Principles, Open Science, Research Data Management, Research on ResearchAbstract
The FAIR principles have emerged as a global standard for Research Data Management but their application has not had the expected impact, especially considering the considerable amount of funding which has been put into FAIR policies. In fact, open research methods have not become the norm, FAIR is still perceived as just another mechanical task for researchers, and quality is still not ensured by the application of the principles. The CARE principles were proposed to complement the FAIR framework, arguing that people and purpose, rather than data and technology, should be at the centre of RDM frameworks. In practice, they have been applied in certain contexts, which we will examine, but their impact has been rather limited. In this article, we will therefore analyse the definition of the Open Science values and principles provided in the UNESCO Recommendation. By doing so, we aim to see if they overlap with the CARE values and principles, and to understand if the latter are useful, and for what. Finally, we note that the UNESCO definition of Open Science already encompasses the values and principles of CARE, while also being broader and more comprehensive. The implementation and practical translation of the FAIR principles into research practices must address an underlying cultural challenge, and this is where the CARE principles can provide meaningful insight, emphasising the importance of starting with context, communities, and their genuine needs. However, these principles are not indispensable, as these considerations are already embedded within the UNESCO Recommendation and, by extension, within the definition of Open Science itself—an ecosystem of practices in which Research Data Management is a foundational pillar.
References
Bosman, Jeroen, Ian Bruno, Chris Chapman, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Nate Jacobs, Bianca Kramer, Maryann Elizabeth Martone, et al.. 2017. ‘The Scholarly Commons - Principles and Practices to Guide Research Communication’. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6c2xt.
Carroll, Stephanie Russo, Ibrahim Garba, Oscar L. Figueroa-Rodríguez, Jarita Holbrook, Raymond Lovett, Simeon Materechera, Mark Parsons, et al.. 2020. ‘The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance’. Data Science Journal 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043.
Carroll, Stephanie Russo, Edit Herczog, Maui Hudson, Keith Russell, and Shelley Stall. 2021. ‘Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous Data Futures’. Scientific Data 8 (1): 108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0.
Carroll, Stephanie Russo, Maui Hudson, Jarita Holbrook, Simeon Materechera, and Jane Anderson. 2020. ‘Working with the CARE Principles: Operationalising Indigenous Data Governance’. 9 November 2020. https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/blog/care-principles-operationalising-indigenous-data-governance/.
Council of the European Union. 2022. ‘Council Conclusions on Research Assessment and Implementation of Open Science’. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/56958/st10126-en22.pdf.
Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission). 2015. Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World: A Vision for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/061652.
———. 2018a. Cost-Benefit Analysis for FAIR Research Data - Cost of Not Having FAIR Research Data. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/02999.
———. 2018b. Turning FAIR into Reality: Final Report and Action Plan from the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR Data. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/1524.
———. 2022. European Research Data Landscape: Final Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/3648.
Dumouchel, Suzanne, Katarzyna Anna Nawrot, and Erzsébet Tóth-Czifra. 2024. ‘FAIR Implementation Workshop: Assessing National Current FAIR-Enabling Capabilities’. May 15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11234295.
European Commission. 2024. ‘Horizon Europe (HORIZON) Euratom Research and Training Programme (EURATOM) General Model Grant Agreement’. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/common/agr-contr/general-mga_horizon-euratom_en.pdf.
European Parliament and European Council. 2023. Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2023 on Harmonised Rules on Fair Access to and Use of Data and Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 (Data Act) (Text with EEA Relevance). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2854/oj/eng.
G7 Science Ministries. 2023. ‘Annex 1: G7 Open Science Working Group (OSWG)’. https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/kokusaiteki/g7_2023/annex1_os.pdf.
Gupta, Neha, Andrew Martindale, Kisha Supernant, and Michael Elvidge. 2023. ‘The CARE Principles and the Reuse, Sharing, and Curation of Indigenous Data in Canadian Archaeology’. Advances in Archaeological Practice 11 (1): 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2022.33.
Jennings, Lydia, Talia Anderson, Andrew Martinez, Rogena Sterling, Dominique David Chavez, Ibrahim Garba, Maui Hudson, Nanibaa’ A. Garrison, and Stephanie Russo Carroll. 2023. ‘Applying the “CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance” to Ecology and Biodiversity Research’. Nature Ecology & Evolution 7 (10): 1547–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02161-2.ì
Krūminas, Pijus, Joy Davidson, Ingrid Dillo, Carmela Asero, Jonas Antanavičius, Peter Doorn, Aurinta Garbašauskaitė, et al. 2022. ‘European Research Data Landscape Study Report (Deliverables 3.2, 4.2, 5.2). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7351121.
Leonelli, Sabina. 2023. Philosophy of Open Science. Elements in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/philosophy-of-open-science/0D049ECF635F3B676C03
C6868873E406.
The Royal Society. 2012. Science as an Open Enterprise: Open Data for Open Science. The Royal Society Science Policy Centre report 02/12. London. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-saoe.pdf
UNESCO. 2021. ‘UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science’. UNESCO Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546.
———. 2023. Open Science Outlook 1: Status and Trends around the World. UNESCO Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.54677/GIIC6829.
United Nations General Assembly. 2007. ‘United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Resolution / Adopted by the General Assembly A/RES/61/295’. https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/unga/2007/en/49353.
Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, et al. 2016. ‘The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship’. Scientific Data 3 (March):160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Francesca Di Donato, Lottie Provost

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.