Beyond Automation: AI as a Pedagogical Mediator in Collaborative Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2532-8816/24266Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Collaborative Learning, Pedagogical Mediation, Socio-cultural Theory, Distributed Cognition, Epistemic AgencyAbstract
Research on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) has predominantly conceptualized AI as a tool for automation, personalization, or instructional efficiency, often privileging individual learning outcomes over social and relational processes. This instrumental orientation has resulted in a theoretical misalignment between contemporary AI systems, particularly generative and interactive models, and established pedagogical understandings of collaborative learning as a socially mediated, co-regulated process. As a consequence, the role of AI in shaping interaction, epistemic agency, and shared regulation in collaborative learning remains under-theorized. This paper advances a conceptual framework that reconceptualizes AI as a pedagogical mediator in collaborative learning environments. Drawing on socio-cultural theory, distributed cognition, connectivist perspectives, and recent research in AI-supported collaborative learning, the framework positions AI as an active participant in the orchestration of interaction, epistemic sense-making, and regulatory processes, without displacing learner or teacher agency. Rather than treating AI as a tutor, peer, or automated orchestrator, the framework foregrounds mediation as a pedagogical function through which agency, authority, and responsibility are dynamically redistributed across human and non-human actors. The paper makes three contributions. First, it offers a theoretically grounded reconceptualization of AI’s role in collaborative learning that moves beyond tool-centric and individualistic paradigms. Second, it articulates key mediating functions of AI, interactional, epistemic, and regulatory, and examines their implications for collaborative learning design. Third, it critically addresses ethical, professional, and governance challenges associated with AI-mediated collaboration, with particular attention to equity, transparency, and teacher professional judgment.
References
Alfiras, M.I.I., Emran, A.Q. & Mohamed, A.M. (2025). Ethics and governance of generative AI in education: a systematic review on responsible adoption. Discover Education (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01051-y
Bayne, S. (2018). Posthumanism: A navigation aid for educators. on_education: Journal for Research and Debate, 2(1). 1-7.
Biesta, G. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
Casebourne, I., Shi, S., Hogan, M., Holmes, W., Hoel, T., Wegerif, R., & Yuan, L. (2025). Using AI to support education for collective intelligence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35, 1597–1629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00437-7
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge University Press.
Damşa, C., Andriessen, J. (2012). Shared Epistemic Agency For Knowledge Creation. In: Moen, A., Mørch, A.I., Paavola, S. (eds) Collaborative Knowledge Creation. Technology Enhanced Learning, 7. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-004-0_11
Degen, P.-B. & Asanov, I. (2025). Beyond Automation: Socratic AI, Epistemic Agency, and the Implications of the Emergence of Orchestrated Multi-Agent Learning Architectures. arxiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.05116
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Elsevier.
Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.013
Dillenbourg, P. (2016). The Evolution of Research on Digital Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0106-z
Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning (pp. 525–552). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_26
European Commission (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence and data in teaching and learning for educators. https://education.ec.europa.eu/news/ethical-guidelines-on-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-and-data-in-teaching-and-learning-for-educators
European Commission (2023). EU AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligence. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
Fenwick, T. (2014). Sociomateriality in medical practice and learning: Attuning to what matters. Medical Education, 48(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12295
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. Routledge.
Gourlay, L. (2020). Posthumanism and the Digital University: Texts, Bodies and Materialities. Bloomsbury Publishing
Guitert Catasús, M., Romeu Fontanillas, T., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Cerro Martínez, J. P. (2025). Collaborative Learning Analytics: Centring the Ethical Implications Around Teacher and Student Empowerment. A Systematic Review. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(1), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8489
Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. (1st ed.). Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Designing for Complementarity: Teacher and Student Needs for Orchestration Support in AI-enhanced Classrooms. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, Chicago, IL, USA. June 25 - 29, 2019.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
Kim, J., Detrick, R., Yu, S., Song, Y., Bol, L., & Li, N. (2025). Socially shared regulation of learning and artificial intelligence: Opportunities to support socially shared regulation. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 11483–11521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13187-9
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Bossu, C., Charitonos, K., Coughlan, T., Deacon, A., Deane, N., Ferguson, R., Herodotou, C., Huang, C-W., Mayisela, T., Rets, I., Sargent, J., Scanlon, E., Small, J., Walji, S., Weller, M., & Whitelock, D. (2023). Innovating Pedagogy 2023: Open University Innovation Report 11. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lee, G.-G., Mun, S., Shin, M.-K., & Zhai, X. (2025). Collaborative learning with artificial intelligence speakers: Pre-service elementary science teachers’ responses to the prototype. Science & Education, 34, 847–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00526-y
Luckin, R. (2018). Enhancing Learning and Teaching with Technology: What the Research Says. Institute of Education Press (IOE Press).
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson. https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/edu.google.com/en//pdfs/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf
Mustafa, M.Y., Tlili, A., Lampropoulos, G., Huang, R., Jandrić, P., Zhao, J., Salha, S.S., Xu, L., Panda, S., Kinshuk, López‐Pernas, S., & Saqr, M. (2024). A systematic review of literature reviews on artificial intelligence in education (AIED): a roadmap to a future research agenda. Smart Learning Environments, 11(59). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00350-5
Oppenheimer, D. M., Cash, T. N., & Connell Pensky, A. E. (2025). You’ve got AI friend in me: LLMs as collaborative learning partners. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35, 3896–3921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00521-6
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury.
Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2, 3-10.
Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576362
Suthers, D.D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. Computer Supported Learning 1, 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y
VanLehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Methods. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226852904.001.0001
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195117530.001.0001
Williamson, B. & Piattoeva, N. (2019). Objectivity as Standardization in Data-Scientific Education Policy, Technology and Governance. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 64-76.
Williamson, Β., Macgilchrist, F. & Potter, J. (2023). Re-examining AI, automation and datafication in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2167830
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Woolf, B. P. (2007). Building intelligent interactive tutors. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373594-2.X0001-9
Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Elsevier & Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373594-2.X0001-9
Yan, L. (2025). From tool to collaborator: AI agency in human-AI collaborative learning. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14825
Yan, Y., Liu, H., & Chau, T. (2025). A Systematic Review of AI Ethics in Education: Challenges, Policy Gaps, and Future Directions. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 33(1), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.386381
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Niari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.