Una panoramica delle strategie di conservazione di opere d’arte digitale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2532-8816/8209Keywords:
Digital art conservation, Born digital art, Conservation strategies, Preservation, Digital conservationAbstract
This text presents a guide to long-term conservation strategies for digital artwork. In addition to a brief presentation of each strategy mentioned in the literature on the subject, the reader will find a first approach to the main problems and bibliographical references to technical discussions. The consulted studies speak of a series of strategies among which museum employees and conservation professionals must choose on a case-by-case basis depending on the nature of the work. In fact, digital art works have characteristics (the physical components, the architecture of computer programs and the communicative and interactive aspects) that are extremely multiform and variable during their life cycle. The examples of works collected from the bibliography represent this fluid scenario. The computer allows the creation of new artistic languages, new forms and new aesthetics (such as virtual or augmented reality) which undermine conservative practices and principles linked to the preservation of material objects. Digital art is a type of conceptual, ephemeral and procedural art and it presents similarities with the conservative issues of contemporary art. Added to this are problems related to the use of computer networks, the miniaturization of physical components (hardware) and the extreme volatility of instructions (software) in computer language. The latter are given by the programmer/artist who often leaves his "mark" within them. Because operating system, computers and storage media have a short life cycle and are rapidly replaced by research and market innovations, digital works remain behind and, without any conservation measure, are condemned to illegibility in a few years. The literature on the subject privileges the conservation of the intangible and conceptual components of the artistic product compared to the physical and technological ones. The latter quickly become obsolete and may (must) be replaced or adapted to the context over the long term.References
Aziosmanoff, Florent et al. “Digital art posterity: building a data model for digital art corpora.” In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Digital Preservation (IPRES), Kyoto, Japan, September 25 - 29, 2017. Accessed May 24, 2018. https://ipres2017.jp/wp-content/uploads/ver09.pdf.
Ashe, Alistair, Patrícia Falcão and Brian Jones. “Virtualisation as a Tool for the Conservation of Software-Based Artworks.” In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Digital Preservation (IPRES), Melbourne, Australia, October 6 - 10, 2014, 83-90. Accessed May 24, 2018.
http://www.ipres-conference.org/ipres14/sites/default/files/upload/iPres-Proceedings-final.pdf.
Desiree Alexander et al. Preserving and Emulating Digital Art Objects. White Paper Report Submitted to the National Endowment for the Humanities, Cornell University Library, November 2015. Accessed May 24, 2018. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/41368.
Batagelj, Borut and Franc Solina. “Preservation of an interactive computer-based art installation – a case study.” International Journal of Arts and Technology 10, no. 3 (2017): 206-30.
Catricalà, Valentino. Media art. Prospettive delle arti verso il XXI secolo: Storie, teorie, preservazione. Sesto San Giovanni, MI: Mimesis, 2016.
Communication Strategies Lab, ed. Realtà aumentate. Esperienze, strategie e contenuti per l'augmented reality. Milano: Apogeo, 2012.
Cowick, Carmen. “Beyond traditional art: Strategies for the preservation of digital art.” Journal of Digital Media Management 5, no. 1 (Autumn/Fall 2016): 70-75.
Dekker, Annet. “Enabling the future, or how to survive forever.” In A companion to digital art, edited by Christiane Paul, 557-68. Chichester- New York - Brisbane - Toronto – Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
Duncan, Sumitra and Karl Rainer Blumenthal. “A collaborative model for web archiving ephemeral art resources at the New York Art Resources Consortium (NYARC).” Art Libraries Journal 41, no. 2 (2016): 116-126.
Enge, Jürgen and Tabea Lurk. “Operational Practices for a Digital Preservation and Restoration Protocol.” In Preserving and Exhibiting Media Art: Challenges and Perspectives, edited by Julia Noordegraaf et al., 270-81. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2013.
Ensom, Tom, Patricia Falcão and Klaus Rechert. “Towards a Risk Model for Emulation-based Preservation Strategies: A Case Study from the Software-based Art Domain.” In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Digital Preservation (IPRES), Bern, Switzerland, October 3 - 6, 2016, 139-148. Accessed May 24, 2018.
https://services.phaidra.univie.ac.at/api/object/o:502767/diss/Content/get.
Espenschied, Dragan et al. “Large-Scale Curation and Presentation of CD-ROM Art.” In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Preservation (IPRES), Lisbon, Portugal, September 3 – 5, 2013, 45-52. Accessed May 24, 2018. http://purl.pt/24107/1/iPres2013_PDF/iPres2013-Proceedings.pdf.
Espenschied, Dragan et al. “Exhibiting Digital Art via Emulation: Boot-to-Emulator with the EMiL Kiosk System.” In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Digital Preservation (IPRES), Bern, Switzerland, October 3 - 6, 2016, 37-40. Accessed May 24, 2018.
https://services.phaidra.univie.ac.at/api/object/o:502767/diss/Content/get.
Fino-Radin, Ben. “The nuts and bolts of handling digital art.” In A companion to digital art, edited by Christiane Paul, 516-36. Chichester- New York - Brisbane - Toronto – Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
Fino-Radin, Ben. “Digital Art Storage: What Every Conservator Needs to Know.” Medium, February 13, 2018. Accessed May 24, 2018. https://medium.com/@benfinoradin/digital-art-storage-e10a7b0e0d89.
Geroimenko, Vladimir, ed. Augmented Reality Art: From an Emerging Technology to a Novel Creative Medium. New York: Springer, 2014.
Häberle, Martin et al. “A Case Study on Emulation-based Preservation in the Museum: Flusser Hypertext.” In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Digital Preservation (IPRES), Bern, Switzerland, October 3 - 6, 2016, 149-158. Accessed May 24, 2018.
https://services.phaidra.univie.ac.at/api/object/o:502767/diss/Content/get.
Hoen, Paulien’t et al. Project transformation digital art: Preservation of born-digital art, LIMA, 2016. Accessed May 24, 2018. http://www.li-ma.nl/site/sites/default/files/tda_eng_interactief.pdf.
Hoffmann Allison. K. “Software-based Art: Challenges and Strategies for Museum Collections.” MA diss., University of Washington, 2013. Accessed May 24, 2018.
Hope, Cat and John Ryan. Digital Arts: An Introduction to New Media. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.
Houghton, Bernadette. “Preservation Challenges in the Digital Age.” D-Lib Magazine 22, no. 7/8 (July/August 2016). Accessed May 24, 2018.
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july16/houghton/07houghton.html.
Ippolito, Jon. “Trusting amateurs with our future.” In A companion to digital art, edited by Christiane Paul, 537-52. Chichester- New York - Brisbane - Toronto – Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
Kastrenakes, Jacob. “The art arcade: MoMA collects 40 years of innovative design.” The verge, February 17, 2014. Accessed May 24, 2018. https://www.theverge.com/2014/2/17/5419530/moma-collection-of-ideas-exhibition-paola-antonelli.
Kelly, James. “Crowdsourcing - Exhibition at the Brooklyn Museum.” Arts Audiences, December 11, 2012. Accessed May 24, 2018. http://artsaudiences.com/crowdsourcing-exhibition-at-the-brooklyn-museum/.
Kovari, Jason. In the Service of Art: Metadata for Preservation of Interactive Digital Artworks. Cornell University Library, June 7, 2015. Accessed May 24, 2018.
https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/40759.
Krewer, Drew and Chelcie J. Rowell. Preservation Metadata for Complex Digital Objects. Report of the ALCTS PARS Preservation Metadata Interest Group Meeting, American Library Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, June 2015. Accessed May 24, 2018.
Kwastek, Katia. Aesthetics of Interaction in Digital Art. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015.
Maniello, Donato, Realtà aumentata in spazi pubblici: Tecniche base di video mapping. Potenza: Le Penseur, 2014.
Manovich, Lev. Software culture. Milano: Olivares, 2010 [Original title Software takes command. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2010].
Marchese, Francis T. “Conserving software-based artwork through software Engineering.” In IEEE Digital Heritage International Congress, volume 2, Marseille, France, October 28 – November 1, 2013, 181–184.
Mc.Garrigle, Conor. “Preserving born digital art: lessons from artists practice.” New review of information networking 20 (2015): 170-178.
Mc.Garrigle, Conor. “Augmented Interventions: Re-defining Urban Interventions with AR and Open Data.” In Augmented Reality Art, edited by Vladimir Geroimenko, 81-95. New York: Springer, 2014.
Noordegraaf, Julia et al. Preserving and Exhibiting Media Art: Challenges and Perspectives. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2013.
Paul, Christiane, ed. A Companion to Digital Art. Chichester- New York - Brisbane - Toronto – Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
Pinelli, Antonio. La storia dell’arte: Istruzioni per l’uso. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2009.
Rinehart, Richard and Jon Ippolito. Re-collection Art: New Media, and Social Memory. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.
Serexhe, Bernhard, ed. Preservation of Digital Art: Theory and Practice: The digital art conservation project. Vienna: Ambra, 2013.
Stricot, Morgane. “Retro-Engineering and Alternative Histories: Possible Roads toward Media Archaeological Reconstruction.” Leonardo 50, no. 2 (2017): 192–193.
Takhteyev, Yuri and Quinn DuPont. “Retrocomputing as Preservation.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital Preservation (IPRES), Toronto, Canada, October 1 – 5, 2012, 333-35 Accessed May 24, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Michele Foti
The copyrights and publishing rights of all articles in this journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.