Text analysis ed editoria digitale: proposte di integrazione con valutazioni critiche. A proposito del carteggio tra Ignazio Silone e la Arnoldo Mondadori Editore
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2532-8816/12762Parole chiave:
Ignazio Silone, Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, Carteggi letterari, Topic modeling, Sentiment analysisAbstract
Le tecniche di text analysis trovano ampia applicazione nell’umanistica digitale, in particolare a supporto della critica letteraria su vasti corpora di fonti primarie. In questo articolo si ripercorre, in prospettiva editoriale, la sperimentazione di tecniche di analisi computazionale dei testi – nella fattispecie topic modeling e sentiment analysis – su un corpus di carte d’archivio, il carteggio tra Ignazio Silone e la Arnoldo Mondadori Editore (396 pezzi epistolari). Alla luce dei risultati emersi, si è giunti a ipotizzare come questi strumenti, al di fuori della critica letteraria strictu sensu, possano ricoprire un ruolo di rilievo anche nello studio e, soprattutto, nell’edizione di epistolari d’autore, e come i loro output, integrati a metodologie e tecniche del digital scholarly editing, possano rendere più produttiva l’esperienza di fruizione per i lettori.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Cambria, Eric and Amir Hussain. Sentic Computing. A Common-Sense-Based Framework for Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis. Cham: Springer, 2015.
Da, Nan Z. “The Computational Case against Computational Literary Studies.” Critical Inquiry 45 (2019): 601-39.
Drucker, Johanna. “Why Distant Reading Isn’t.” PMLA 132, 3 (2017): 628-35.
Fenu, Cristina. “Sentiment Analysis d’autore: l’epistolario di Italo Svevo.” In AIUCD 2017 CONFERENCE. Il telescopio inverso: big data e distant reading nelle discipline umanistiche, eds. Fabio Ciotti, Gianfranco Crupi, 133-9. Firenze: Associazione per l’Informatica Umanistica e la Cultura Digitale, 2017. http://doi.org/10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5885.
Graham, Shawn, Ian Milligan. “Review of MALLET, Produced by Andrew Kachites McCallum.” Journal of Digital Humanities 2, 1 (2012): 73-5.
Hammond, Adam. “The Double Bind of Validation: Distant Reading and the Digital Humanities' ‘trough of disillusionment’.” Literature Compass (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12402.
Hotson, Howard, Wallnig, Thomas, eds. Reassembling the Republic of Letters in the Digital Age. Standards, Systems, Scholarship. Göttingen: Göttingen University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17875/gup2019-1146.
Jänicke Stefan, Franzini Greta, Cheema Muhammad Faisal, et al. “On Close and Distant Reading in Digital Humanities: A Survey and Future Challenges.” In Eurographics Conference on Visualization. STARs – State of The Art Reports, eds. Rita Borgo, Fabio Ganovelli, Ivan Viola, 83-104. The Eurographics Association, 2015.
Jannidis, Fotis. “On the Perceived Complexity of Literature. A Response to Nan Z. Da.” Journal of Cultural Analytics. https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.11829.
Jockers, Matthew L. Macroanalysis. Digital Methods and Literary History, Urbana-Chicago-Springfield: University of Illinois Press, 2013.
Kokensparger, Brian. Guide to Programming for the Digital Humanities: Lessons for Introductory Python. Cham: Springer, 2018.
Liu, Bing. Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Malfatti, Stefano. “The Digital Edition of Alcide De Gasperi’s Correspondence. Some Reflections on an Ongoing Project.” Jlis.it 11, 1 (2006): 89-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12599.
Moretti, Franco. “Conjectures on World Literature.” New Left Review 1 (2000): 54-68.
Moretti, Giovanni, Rachele Sprugnoli, Stefano Menini, et al. “ALCIDE: Extracting and Visualising Content from Large Document Collections to Support Humanities Studies.” Knowledge-Based Systems 111 (2016): 100-12.
Moretti, Giovanni, Rachele Sprugnoli, Sara Tonelli. “Digging in the Dirt: Extracting Keyphrases from Texts with KD.” In Proceedings of the Second Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2015, a cura di Cristina Bosco, Sara Tonelli, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto, 198-203. Torino: Accademia UP, 2015.
Moretti, Giovanni, Rachele Sprugnoli, Sara Tonelli. “LETTERE: LETters Transcription Environment for REsearch.” In Patrimoni culturali nell’era digitale. Memorie, culture umanistiche e tecnologia / Cultural Heritage in the Digital Age. Memory, Humanities and Technologies, ed. Daria Spampinato, 207-9. Bologna: Associazione per l’Informatica Umanistica e la Cultura Digitale, 2018.
Piper, Andrew. “Do We Know What Are We Doing?.” Journal of Cultural Analytics (2019). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.11826.
Rhody, Lisa M. “Topic Modeling and Figurative Language.” Journal of Digital Humanities 2, 1 (2012): 19-35.
Schofield, Alexandra, Måns Magnusson, David Mimno. “Pulling Out the Stops: Rethinking Stopword Removal for Topic Models.” In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. II, Short Papers, eds. Mirella Lapata, Phil Blunsom, Alexander Koller, 432-6. Valencia: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017.
Shillingsburg, Peter L. From Gutenberg To Google. Electronic Representations of Literary Texts. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Shillingsburg, Peter L. Textuality and Knowledge. Essays. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2017.
Sinclair, Stéfan, Geoffrey Rockwell. “Teaching Computer-Assisted Text Analysis: Approaches to Learning New Methodologies”. In Digital Humanities Pedagogy: Practices, Principles and Politics, ed. Brett D. Hirsch, 241-63. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2012.
Tonelli, Sara, Rachele Sprugnoli, Giovanni Moretti, et al. “Epistolario De Gasperi. National Edition of De Gasperi’s Letters in Digital Format.” In La svolta inevitabile. Sfide e prospettive per l’informatica umanistica, a cura di Cristina Marras, Marco Passarotti, Greta Franzini, et al., 253-59. Milano: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2020.
Underwood, Ted. “A Genealogy of Distant Reading.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 11, 2 (2017).
Underwood, Ted. Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019a.
Underwood, Ted. Intervento in Computational Literary Studies: A Critical Inquiry Online Forum. (<https://critinq.wordpress.com/2019/04/02/computational-literary-studies-participant-forum-responses-day-2-4/>), 2019b.
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2021 Alberto Baldi
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.