Fattori psicolinguistici nella formazione della personalità creativa

Autori

  • Kulzhibek Kusmanova Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University
  • Aida Aitmukashova Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University
  • Assem Nurlanova Kazakh-American Free University
  • Lazzat Baimanova Sh. Ualikhanov Kokshetau University
  • Gainigul Ismailova Shakаrim University of Semey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2532-8816/20952

Parole chiave:

flessibilità sintattica, linguaggio, creatività, vocabolario, pensiero metaforico

Abstract

Lo studio della relazione tra linguaggio e creatività non solo rivela i meccanismi del pensiero creativo in diversi ambiti, ma assume anche una rilevanza particolare nel contesto contemporaneo. Comprendere l’impatto del linguaggio sulla formazione della personalità creativa è fondamentale per sviluppare metodi educativi volti a sostenere le capacità creative. Questo studio si propone di individuare il legame tra la diversità della composizione lessicale e il potenziale creativo. La ricerca si basa su dati empirici, che includono l’analisi delle caratteristiche quantitative e sostanziali della ricchezza lessicale di noti individui creativi in Kazakistan, nonché il confronto con rappresentanti di professioni non legate alla creatività. Nel corso dello studio sono stati identificati tre principali parametri psicolinguistici della personalità creativa: flessibilità sintattica, pensiero metaforico e repertorio lessicale. La flessibilità sintattica riflette la capacità di esprimere la stessa idea attraverso diverse costruzioni sintattiche. Il pensiero metaforico implica l’abilità di inserire metafore nel discorso, contribuendo alla formazione di nuove associazioni. Il repertorio lessicale comprende la molteplicità di parole che un individuo possiede e utilizza nel proprio linguaggio. La ricerca, basata su dati empirici, ha rivelato che gli individui creativi che operano nelle arti possiedono un repertorio lessicale più ampio rispetto ai rappresentanti delle professioni non creative, come confermato dagli indicatori quantitativi. Un’analisi qualitativa della frequenza d’uso di nomi e verbi ha inoltre mostrato che le personalità creative usano più frequentemente termini legati alla creatività e a concetti astratti, mentre i rappresentanti delle professioni non creative tendono a concentrarsi su temi più concreti e legati all’attività lavorativa. Lo studio ha un valore pratico, in quanto fornisce una base per lo sviluppo di programmi educativi finalizzati a promuovere la creatività e a formare capacità creative in diversi ambiti dell’attività umana.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Gabdolla, Akishev, and Jenisgul Baigozhina. 2021. “The Formation of Cognitive Linguistics.” News of Kazakh Ablai Khan University of International Relations and World Languages 60 (1).

Momynova, Bagdan Kataevna. 2019. “Cognitive Linguistics and Conceptualization Process.” Tiltanym 1: 18–27.

Efremov, Andrei. 2025. “The Psychology of Faith and Religious Identity: How Theology Shapes Worldview and Self-Perception.” Pharos Journal of Theology 106 (3): 1–15.

Аshirovа, Anar Tishibayevna, Aigul Niyazbekovna Atahanova, Shafiga Asylbekovna Ramazanova, and Amanzhol Abdykadyrovich Baniyazov. 2021. “Application of Language to the Main Issues of Cognitive Linguistics as а Sub-Branch of Cognitive Science.” Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education 181 (1): 96–102.

Sheikh, Mona. 2019. “The Significance of Worldview Analysis for Social Sciences.” In Entering Religious Minds: The Social Study of Worldviews, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468810-11

Doszhan, Raikhan. 2023. “Multi-vector cultural connection in the conditions of modern globalisation.” Interdisciplinary Cultural and Humanities Review 2 (1): 27–32.

Dauletova, Makhabbat Tursynbekovna. 2021. “The Concept as the Main Unit of Cognitive Linguistics and Linguoculturology.” The Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan 6: 146–152.

Daurenbekova, Laura, Imanberdiyeva Saule, Baitanassova Karlygash, Akniyet Ozat, and Alimbayev Aslan. 2024. “Transformation of Literary Translations of the Literary Classics by Abai Kunanbayev.” New Voices in Translation Studies 29 (2): 66–87.

Malyk, Valentyna. 2024. “Psycholinguistic factors of foreign language acquisition.” Scientia et Societus 3(2): 82–92.

Baizakov, Zhenish. 2023. “History of Formation of Cognitive Linguistics.” European Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Development 13: 193–197.

Shaikhova, P. 2022. “Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Word Meaning (Based on the Concept of Prestige).” In Current Problems of Philology, 3089–3094. https://rep.enu.kz/handle/enu/3798

Kenesei, Istvan. 2013. “The Role of Creativity in the Cognitive Turn in Linguistics.” International Review of Pragmatics 5: 271–292.

Onsman, Harry Julian. 1982. Creativity and Linguistic Theory: A study of the Creative Aspect of Language. Sydney: University of Tasmania.

Shapran, Olha, Shapran Yurii, Pomyluiko Vira, Gusak Liudmyla, and Shapran Oleksii. 2025. “Age-related changes in the development of communicative competence in adults.” Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy 13 (1): 56–69.

Tanana, Svitlana, and Soga Liudmyla. 2023. “Formation of communicative culture of future service sector specialists: Theoretical analysis and practical perspectives.” Scientia et Societus 2 (2): 42–52.

Hoff, Sara, & Barboza Gabriela. 2025. “Languages, Language, and Linguists: The Study of the Diversity of Languages According to Saussure and Benveniste.” Bakhtiniana 20 (1): e65692e.

Dovhan, Nataliia. 2020. “Sociocultural interactions of generations: Research resources of the discourse analysis.” Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology 26 (2): 179–187.

Ferreira, Victor S. 1996. “Is it Better to Give than to Donate? Syntactic Flexibility in Language Production.” Journal of Memory and Language 35 (5): 724–755.

Lieven, Elena, Heike Behrens, Jennifer Speares, and Michael Tomasello. 2003. “Early Syntactic Creativity: A Usage-Based Approach.” Journal of Child Language 30 (2): 333–370.

Sheikh, Mona, and Juergensmeyer Mark. 2019. Entering Religious Minds: The Social Study of Worldviews. New York: Routledge.

Kravchenko, Kravchenko, and Yudenko Oleksandr. 2025. “Cognitive processing of visual metaphor from the perspective of Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” International Journal of Philology 29 (1): 58–69.

Cherednichenko, Olena. 2024. “The Term “Creativity” in the Discourse of Theories and Concepts.” Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy 12 (4): 90–103.

Sanchez-Ruiz, Maria-Jose, Manuela Romo Santos, and Juan Jiménez Jiménez. 2013. “The Role of Metaphorical Thinking in the Creativity of Scientific Discourse.” Creativity Research Journal 25 (4): 361–368.

Kenett, Yoed N., Rinat Gold, and Miriam Faust. 2018. “Metaphor Comprehension in Low and High Creative Individuals.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 482.

Birdsell, Brian. 2018. Creative Metaphor Production in a First and Second Language and the Role of Creativity. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

Durdas, Alla, Tetiana Harbuza, Yuliia Radchenko, and Hanna Starosta. 2022. “Teaching Foreign Languages Efficiently: The Role of Creative Writing.” Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice 72 (3): 33–38.

Lychuk, Mariya, & O. Nozhovnik. 2020. “Fostering Cognitive and Creative Thinking Styles Through the Use of Innovative Pedagogical Technologies in the Process of Vocational Training.” International Journal of Philology 24 (4): 132–139.

Kieliszek, Zdzislaw. 2024. “The Concept Of Fatherhood In Kant’S Philosophy And Its Current Potential.” Logos (Lithuania) 121: 6–27.

Tatenko, Vitaliy. 2017. “Subjective-action approach as a form of social and psychological thinking.” Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology 23 (1): 27–38.

Gonçalves, Jean. 2024. “What Is (Not) Aesthetic Education?” Bakhtiniana 19 (2): e63561e.

Ahmed, Sana Tariq, and Gregory J. Feist. 2021. “The Language of Creativity: Validating Linguistic Analysis to Assess Creative Scientists and Artists.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 724083.

Ningsih, Rahmi Yulia, Zainal Rafli, and Endry Boeriswati. 2021. “Linguistic Creativity of the Indonesian for Foreign Speakers (BIPA) Students at the Morphological, Syntactic, and Semantic Levels.” Lingua Cultura 15 (2): 199–206.

Körtvélyessy, Lívia, Pavol Štekauer, and Pavol Kačmár. 2021. “On the Role of Creativity in the Formation of New Complex Words.” Linguistics 59 (4): 1017–1055.

Khalil, Radwa, Ben Godde, and Ahmed A. Karim. 2019. “The Link Between Creativity, Cognition, and Creative Drives and Underlying Neural Mechanisms.” Frontiers in Neural Circuits 13: 18.

Guentulle, Victoria, Miguel Nussbaum, Franco Castillo, Pablo Chiuminatto, Jonathan Michael Spector, and Matías Rojas. 2024. “The Relationship Between Creativity and Language as Measured by Linguistic Maturity and Text Production.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 54: 101636.

Shungo, Toshinori Yasuda, Keiko Hanzawa, and Judit Kormos. 2022. “How Does Creativity Affect Second Language Speech Production? The Moderating Role of Speaking Task Type.” TESOL Journal 56: 1320–1344.

Xia, Tiansheng, Yi An, and Jiayue Guo. 2022. “Bilingualism and Creativity: Benefits from Cognitive Inhibition and Cognitive Flexibility.” Frontiers in Psychology 13: 1016777.

Fernández-Fontecha, Almudena, and Yoed Nissan Kenett. 2022. “Examining the Relations between Semantic Memory Structure and Creativity in Second Language.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 45: 101067.

Downloads

Pubblicato

2025-10-01

Come citare

Kusmanova, K., Aitmukashova, A., Nurlanova, A., Baimanova, L., & Ismailova, G. (2025). Fattori psicolinguistici nella formazione della personalità creativa. Umanistica Digitale, 9(21), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2532-8816/20952

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articoli